#2665
Counter II
EasyClosureState Management
Approaches
Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
| Brute Force | Optimal Solution★ | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n²) | O(n) |
| Space | O(1) | O(1) |
💡
Intuition
Time O(n)Space O(1)
The optimal solution uses the same approach as brute force but emphasizes that each function operates in constant time, making it efficient for multiple calls.
⚙️
Algorithm
5 steps- 1Step 1: Initialize a variable `currentCount` with the value of `init`.
- 2Step 2: Define the `increment` function to increase `currentCount` by 1 and return it.
- 3Step 3: Define the `decrement` function to decrease `currentCount` by 1 and return it.
- 4Step 4: Define the `reset` function to set `currentCount` back to `init` and return it.
- 5Step 5: Return an object containing the three functions.
solution.py15 lines
1def createCounter(init):
2 currentCount = init
3 def increment():
4 nonlocal currentCount
5 currentCount += 1
6 return currentCount
7 def decrement():
8 nonlocal currentCount
9 currentCount -= 1
10 return currentCount
11 def reset():
12 nonlocal currentCount
13 currentCount = init
14 return currentCount
15 return {'increment': increment, 'decrement': decrement, 'reset': reset}ℹ
Complexity note: The time complexity is O(n) where n is the number of calls made to the functions. Each function operates in constant time, so the overall complexity is linear with respect to the number of operations.
- 1Functions can maintain state using closures.
- 2Understanding scope and variable lifetime is crucial.
Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.