#1693
Daily Leads and Partners
EasyDatabaseHash MapAggregationGroup By
Approaches
Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
| Brute Force | Optimal Solution★ | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n²) | O(n) |
| Space | O(1) | O(n) |
💡
Intuition
Time O(n)Space O(n)
The optimal solution leverages SQL's grouping and counting capabilities to efficiently aggregate the data in one pass, reducing the need for nested loops.
⚙️
Algorithm
3 steps- 1Step 1: Use the SQL GROUP BY clause to group the data by date_id and make_name.
- 2Step 2: Use COUNT(DISTINCT lead_id) to count unique leads and COUNT(DISTINCT partner_id) for unique partners.
- 3Step 3: Select the grouped results directly.
solution.py3 lines
1SELECT date_id, make_name, COUNT(DISTINCT lead_id) AS unique_leads, COUNT(DISTINCT partner_id) AS unique_partners
2FROM DailySales
3GROUP BY date_id, make_name;ℹ
Complexity note: The complexity is O(n) because we only need to scan the table once to group and count distinct values, making it much more efficient than the brute force approach.
- 1Using GROUP BY can significantly reduce the complexity of aggregation tasks.
- 2Counting distinct values is a common requirement in data analysis.
Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.