#1693

Daily Leads and Partners

Easy
DatabaseHash MapAggregationGroup By
LeetCode ↗

Approaches

Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
Brute ForceOptimal Solution
Time
O(n²)
O(n)
Space
O(1)
O(n)
💡

Intuition

Time O(n)Space O(n)

The optimal solution leverages SQL's grouping and counting capabilities to efficiently aggregate the data in one pass, reducing the need for nested loops.

⚙️

Algorithm

3 steps
  1. 1Step 1: Use the SQL GROUP BY clause to group the data by date_id and make_name.
  2. 2Step 2: Use COUNT(DISTINCT lead_id) to count unique leads and COUNT(DISTINCT partner_id) for unique partners.
  3. 3Step 3: Select the grouped results directly.
solution.py3 lines
1SELECT date_id, make_name, COUNT(DISTINCT lead_id) AS unique_leads, COUNT(DISTINCT partner_id) AS unique_partners
2FROM DailySales
3GROUP BY date_id, make_name;

Complexity note: The complexity is O(n) because we only need to scan the table once to group and count distinct values, making it much more efficient than the brute force approach.

  • 1Using GROUP BY can significantly reduce the complexity of aggregation tasks.
  • 2Counting distinct values is a common requirement in data analysis.

Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.