#2453
Destroy Sequential Targets
MediumArrayHash TableCountingHash MapArray
Approaches
Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
| Brute Force | Optimal Solution★ | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n²) | O(n) |
| Space | O(1) | O(n) |
💡
Intuition
Time O(n)Space O(n)
By using a mapping of remainders when divided by space, we can efficiently count how many targets can be destroyed for each unique remainder. This reduces the number of comparisons needed.
⚙️
Algorithm
3 steps- 1Step 1: Create a frequency map to count how many numbers yield the same remainder when divided by space.
- 2Step 2: Iterate through the nums array to populate the frequency map.
- 3Step 3: Find the maximum count in the frequency map and track the corresponding minimum seed value.
solution.py19 lines
1# Full working Python code
2
3def max_targets(nums, space):
4 from collections import defaultdict
5 freq_map = defaultdict(int)
6 for num in nums:
7 remainder = num % space
8 freq_map[remainder] += 1
9 max_count = 0
10 min_seed = float('inf')
11 for num in nums:
12 remainder = num % space
13 if freq_map[remainder] > max_count or (freq_map[remainder] == max_count and num < min_seed):
14 max_count = freq_map[remainder]
15 min_seed = num
16 return min_seed
17
18# Example usage
19print(max_targets([3,7,8,1,1,5], 2))ℹ
Complexity note: The time complexity is O(n) because we make two passes through the nums array: one to build the frequency map and another to determine the minimum seed. The space complexity is O(n) due to the storage of the frequency map.
- 1Using remainders helps categorize targets efficiently.
- 2The optimal solution reduces unnecessary comparisons.
Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.