#3013
Divide an Array Into Subarrays With Minimum Cost II
HardArrayHash TableSliding WindowHeap (Priority Queue)Hash MapArray
Approaches
Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
| Brute Force | Optimal Solution★ | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n²) | O(n log n) |
| Space | O(1) | O(n) |
💡
Intuition
Time O(n log n)Space O(n)
The optimal solution uses a dynamic programming approach combined with a max heap to efficiently track the smallest costs while adhering to the distance constraint. This reduces the number of combinations we need to check.
⚙️
Algorithm
3 steps- 1Step 1: Initialize a DP array where dp[j] represents the minimum cost to divide the first i elements into j subarrays.
- 2Step 2: Use a max heap to keep track of the smallest costs dynamically as we iterate through the array.
- 3Step 3: For each starting index of a subarray, calculate the cost and update the DP array based on previous results and the heap.
solution.py19 lines
1# Full working Python code
2import heapq
3
4def minCost(nums, k, dist):
5 n = len(nums)
6 dp = [float('inf')] * (k + 1)
7 dp[0] = 0
8 for i in range(n):
9 new_dp = dp[:]
10 max_heap = []
11 for j in range(i + 1):
12 if j > 0:
13 heapq.heappush(max_heap, -nums[j - 1])
14 while max_heap and j - i > dist:
15 heapq.heappop(max_heap)
16 if len(max_heap) >= k - 1:
17 new_dp[k] = min(new_dp[k], dp[k - 1] - max_heap[0] + nums[i])
18 dp = new_dp
19 return dp[k]ℹ
Complexity note: The time complexity is reduced to O(n log n) due to the use of a max heap for maintaining the smallest costs dynamically, allowing us to efficiently update our DP array.
- 1Understanding the cost structure is crucial; it always depends on the first element of each subarray.
- 2The distance constraint limits the possible combinations, which can be leveraged to optimize the solution.
Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.