Exchange Seats — LeetCode #626 (Medium)
Tags: Database
Related patterns: Array, In-place swapping
Brute Force approach
Time complexity: O(n²). Space complexity: O(n).
In this approach, we will iterate through the list of students and swap every two consecutive students' IDs. This is straightforward but inefficient as it requires multiple passes over the data.
The time complexity is O(n²) because we are sorting the swapped list, which can take O(n log n) time. The space complexity is O(n) due to the new list created for swapped students.
- Step 1: Create a new list to store the swapped students.
- Step 2: Iterate through the original list of students two at a time.
- Step 3: For each pair, swap their IDs and add them to the new list. If there's an odd student out, add them as is.
- Step 4: Return the new list sorted by ID.
1. Initial list: [(1, 'Abbot'), (2, 'Doris'), (3, 'Emerson'), (4, 'Green'), (5, 'Jeames')]
2. Swap (1, 'Abbot') and (2, 'Doris') -> [(2, 'Doris'), (1, 'Abbot')]
3. Swap (3, 'Emerson') and (4, 'Green') -> [(2, 'Doris'), (1, 'Abbot'), (4, 'Green'), (3, 'Emerson')]
4. Add (5, 'Jeames') -> [(2, 'Doris'), (1, 'Abbot'), (4, 'Green'), (3, 'Emerson'), (5, 'Jeames')]
5. Sort by ID -> [(1, 'Doris'), (2, 'Abbot'), (3, 'Green'), (4, 'Emerson'), (5, 'Jeames')]
Optimal Solution approach
Time complexity: O(n). Space complexity: O(1).
In the optimal solution, we can directly swap the IDs in a single pass through the list. This avoids the overhead of creating a new list and sorting it, making it more efficient.
The time complexity is O(n) because we only make a single pass through the list. The space complexity is O(1) since we are swapping in place without using additional data structures.
- Step 1: Iterate through the list of students in steps of 2.
- Step 2: For each pair, swap their IDs directly in the original list.
- Step 3: Return the modified list, which is already in the correct order.
1. Initial list: [(1, 'Abbot'), (2, 'Doris'), (3, 'Emerson'), (4, 'Green'), (5, 'Jeames')]
2. Swap (1, 'Abbot') and (2, 'Doris') -> [(2, 'Doris'), (1, 'Abbot'), (3, 'Emerson'), (4, 'Green'), (5, 'Jeames')]
3. Swap (3, 'Emerson') and (4, 'Green') -> [(2, 'Doris'), (1, 'Abbot'), (4, 'Green'), (3, 'Emerson'), (5, 'Jeames')]
4. No swap for (5, 'Jeames') as it's the last one -> [(2, 'Doris'), (1, 'Abbot'), (4, 'Green'), (3, 'Emerson'), (5, 'Jeames')]
Key Insights
- Swapping pairs can be done in a single pass for efficiency.
- Understanding how to manipulate lists directly can save time and space.
Common Mistakes
- Not handling the case of an odd number of students correctly.
- Overcomplicating the solution by creating unnecessary data structures.
Interview Tips
- Always think about the simplest approach first.
- Discuss your thought process out loud to clarify your understanding.
- Consider edge cases like empty lists or lists with one student.