#2212
Maximum Points in an Archery Competition
MediumArrayBacktrackingBit ManipulationEnumerationGreedyBacktracking
Approaches
Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
| Brute Force | Optimal Solution★ | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n²) | O(n) |
| Space | O(1) | O(n) |
💡
Intuition
Time O(n)Space O(n)
The optimal solution uses a greedy approach to allocate Bob's arrows strategically. By focusing on the sections where Bob can win with the least arrows, we maximize his score efficiently.
⚙️
Algorithm
4 steps- 1Step 1: Initialize an array for Bob's arrows and set the maximum points to zero.
- 2Step 2: Iterate from the highest score section (11) to the lowest (0).
- 3Step 3: For each section, check if Bob can win by shooting more arrows than Alice. If so, allocate the necessary arrows and adjust the remaining arrows.
- 4Step 4: If there are arrows left after winning, distribute them to the lowest scoring sections.
solution.py16 lines
1# Full working Python code
2
3def maxPoints(numArrows, aliceArrows):
4 bobArrows = [0] * 12
5 maxPoints = 0
6 arrowsLeft = numArrows
7
8 for score in range(11, -1, -1):
9 if arrowsLeft > aliceArrows[score]:
10 bobArrows[score] = aliceArrows[score] + 1
11 arrowsLeft -= bobArrows[score]
12
13 if arrowsLeft > 0:
14 bobArrows[0] += arrowsLeft
15
16 return bobArrowsℹ
Complexity note: The optimal solution iterates through the scoring sections once, leading to linear complexity. The space complexity is also linear due to the output array.
- 1Bob should aim to win the sections where he can do so with the least arrows.
- 2Distributing remaining arrows to lower scoring sections can help maximize points.
Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.