#2856
Minimum Array Length After Pair Removals
MediumArrayHash TableTwo PointersBinary SearchGreedyCountingHash MapArray
Approaches
Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
| Brute Force | Optimal Solution★ | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n²) | O(n) |
| Space | O(1) | O(1) |
💡
Intuition
Time O(n)Space O(1)
The optimal approach leverages the fact that we can remove pairs of the smallest and largest elements. By counting the occurrences of the smallest element and the largest element, we can determine how many pairs we can remove.
⚙️
Algorithm
4 steps- 1Step 1: Count the occurrences of the smallest and largest elements in the array.
- 2Step 2: Determine the number of pairs that can be removed, which is the minimum of the counts of the smallest and largest elements.
- 3Step 3: Calculate the remaining length of the array after removing these pairs.
- 4Step 4: Return the remaining length.
solution.py10 lines
1# Full working Python code
2
3def min_length_after_removals(nums):
4 min_count = nums.count(nums[0])
5 max_count = nums.count(nums[-1])
6 pairs = min(min_count, max_count)
7 return len(nums) - 2 * pairs
8
9# Example usage
10print(min_length_after_removals([1, 2, 3, 4])) # Output: 0ℹ
Complexity note: The time complexity is O(n) because we only traverse the array once to count the occurrences of the smallest and largest elements. This is efficient compared to the brute-force approach.
- 1The optimal solution focuses on counting occurrences to minimize operations.
- 2Understanding the properties of sorted arrays helps in deriving efficient solutions.
Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.