#3826
Minimum Partition Score
HardArrayDivide and ConquerDynamic ProgrammingQueuePrefix SumMonotonic QueueDynamic ProgrammingPrefix Sum
Approaches
Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
| Brute Force | Optimal Solution★ | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n²) | O(k * n²) |
| Space | O(1) | O(n) |
💡
Intuition
Time O(k * n²)Space O(n)
Using dynamic programming, we can build up the solution by calculating the minimum score for smaller subproblems, leveraging previously computed results to avoid redundant calculations.
⚙️
Algorithm
3 steps- 1Step 1: Initialize a DP table where dp[k][i] represents the minimum score for partitioning the first i elements into k subarrays.
- 2Step 2: Calculate prefix sums to efficiently compute subarray sums.
- 3Step 3: Use a nested loop to fill the DP table, minimizing the score by considering all possible previous partitions.
solution.py12 lines
1def minPartitionScore(nums, k):
2 n = len(nums)
3 prefix = [0] * (n + 1)
4 for i in range(n): prefix[i + 1] = prefix[i] + nums[i]
5 dp = [[float('inf')] * (n + 1) for _ in range(k + 1)]
6 dp[0][0] = 0
7 for i in range(1, n + 1):
8 for j in range(1, k + 1):
9 for p in range(j - 1, i):
10 sumArr = prefix[i] - prefix[p]
11 dp[j][i] = min(dp[j][i], dp[j - 1][p] + sumArr * (sumArr + 1) // 2)
12 return dp[k][n]ℹ
Complexity note: The complexity arises from filling the DP table, where each entry requires iterating over previous partitions, leading to a quadratic factor.
- 1Dynamic programming is effective for partitioning problems.
- 2Prefix sums optimize subarray sum calculations.
Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.