#2809
Minimum Time to Make Array Sum At Most x
HardArrayDynamic ProgrammingSortingGreedySorting
Approaches
Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
| Brute Force | Optimal Solution★ | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n²) | O(n log n) |
| Space | O(1) | O(n) |
💡
Intuition
Time O(n log n)Space O(n)
The optimal solution leverages sorting and a greedy approach. By prioritizing which indices to set to zero based on their increment rates, we can minimize the time needed to achieve the target sum.
⚙️
Algorithm
3 steps- 1Step 1: Pair each element of nums1 with its corresponding element in nums2 and sort these pairs based on the values in nums2 in descending order.
- 2Step 2: Initialize a variable to track the current sum of nums1 and the time taken.
- 3Step 3: Iterate through the sorted pairs, incrementing the time and adjusting the current sum until it is less than or equal to x.
solution.py12 lines
1def minTime(nums1, nums2, x):
2 n = len(nums1)
3 current_sum = sum(nums1)
4 pairs = sorted(zip(nums1, nums2), key=lambda p: p[1])
5 time = 0
6 for i in range(n):
7 if current_sum <= x:
8 return time
9 current_sum += pairs[i][1]
10 current_sum -= pairs[i][0]
11 time += 1
12 return time if current_sum <= x else -1ℹ
Complexity note: The time complexity is O(n log n) due to the sorting step, while the space complexity is O(n) for storing the pairs of nums1 and nums2.
- 1Setting an index to zero should be done in the order of the increment rates to minimize the overall time.
- 2The sum of nums1 can only be reduced by setting elements to zero, so careful selection is crucial.
Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.