#1519

Number of Nodes in the Sub-Tree With the Same Label

Medium
Hash TableTreeDepth-First SearchBreadth-First SearchCountingDepth-First Search (DFS)Tree TraversalCounting with Arrays
LeetCode ↗

Approaches

Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
Brute ForceOptimal Solution
Time
O(n²)
O(n)
Space
O(1)
O(n)
💡

Intuition

Time O(n)Space O(n)

The optimal solution uses a single DFS traversal to count labels in the subtree while returning counts up the tree. This avoids redundant calculations and efficiently aggregates results.

⚙️

Algorithm

4 steps
  1. 1Step 1: Build the graph from the edges.
  2. 2Step 2: Perform a DFS starting from the root node.
  3. 3Step 3: Maintain a count array for labels in the subtree.
  4. 4Step 4: For each node, update the result based on the counts of its label.
solution.py22 lines
1def countSubtrees(n, edges, labels):
2    from collections import defaultdict
3    graph = defaultdict(list)
4    for a, b in edges:
5        graph[a].append(b)
6        graph[b].append(a)
7
8    result = [0] * n
9    def dfs(node, parent):
10        count = [0] * 26
11        count[ord(labels[node]) - ord('a')] += 1
12        for neighbor in graph[node]:
13            if neighbor != parent:
14                child_count = dfs(neighbor, node)
15                for i in range(26):
16                    count[i] += child_count[i]
17        result[node] = count[ord(labels[node]) - ord('a')]
18        return count
19
20    dfs(0, -1)
21    return result
22

Complexity note: The complexity is O(n) because we perform a single DFS traversal of the tree, visiting each node once, and using additional space for the count of labels.

  • 1Using DFS allows us to efficiently count nodes in subtrees without redundant calculations.
  • 2Maintaining a count array for labels helps aggregate results as we backtrack through the tree.

Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.