#763
Partition Labels
MediumHash TableTwo PointersStringGreedyHash MapArray
Approaches
Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
| Brute Force | Optimal Solution★ | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n²) | O(n) |
| Space | O(1) | O(n) |
💡
Intuition
Time O(n)Space O(n)
The optimal solution uses a greedy approach with a hashmap to track the last occurrence of each character. This allows us to expand our partition until we have included all instances of the characters in the current partition.
⚙️
Algorithm
4 steps- 1Step 1: Create a hashmap to store the last index of each character in the string.
- 2Step 2: Initialize variables to track the current partition's end index and the start index.
- 3Step 3: Iterate through the string, updating the end index to the maximum last index of the characters seen so far.
- 4Step 4: When the current index matches the end index, record the size of the partition and update the start index.
solution.py13 lines
1# Full working Python code
2from collections import defaultdict
3
4def partition_labels(s):
5 last = {c: i for i, c in enumerate(s)}
6 partitions = []
7 start, end = 0, 0
8 for i, c in enumerate(s):
9 end = max(end, last[c])
10 if i == end:
11 partitions.append(end - start + 1)
12 start = i + 1
13 return partitionsℹ
Complexity note: This complexity is linear because we make a single pass to record the last indices and another pass to determine the partitions, resulting in O(n) time overall.
- 1Understanding the last occurrence of characters is crucial for determining valid partitions.
- 2Greedy approaches can often lead to optimal solutions by making local optimal choices.
Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.