#2003

Smallest Missing Genetic Value in Each Subtree

Hard
ArrayDynamic ProgrammingTreeDepth-First SearchUnion-FindHash MapArray
LeetCode ↗

Approaches

Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
Brute ForceOptimal Solution
Time
O(n²)
O(n)
Space
O(1)
O(n)
💡

Intuition

Time O(n)Space O(n)

The optimal approach uses a depth-first search (DFS) to traverse the tree while maintaining a count of genetic values present in each subtree. This allows us to efficiently determine the smallest missing value without redundant traversals.

⚙️

Algorithm

3 steps
  1. 1Step 1: Build the tree structure from the parents array.
  2. 2Step 2: Perform a DFS from the root, maintaining a count of genetic values in a boolean array.
  3. 3Step 3: For each node, find the smallest missing genetic value by checking the boolean array.
solution.py21 lines
1def smallestMissingValue(parents, nums):
2    n = len(parents)
3    ans = [0] * n
4    tree = [[] for _ in range(n)]
5    for i in range(n):
6        if parents[i] != -1:
7            tree[parents[i]].append(i)
8    
9    def dfs(node, present):
10        present[nums[node]] = True
11        for child in tree[node]:
12            dfs(child, present)
13
14    for i in range(n):
15        present = [False] * (n + 2)
16        dfs(i, present)
17        for missing in range(1, n + 2):
18            if not present[missing]:
19                ans[i] = missing
20                break
21    return ans

Complexity note: The complexity is O(n) because we traverse each node once and use a boolean array of size n+2 to track present values, allowing us to efficiently find the smallest missing value.

  • 1Understanding tree traversal is crucial for solving subtree problems.
  • 2Using boolean arrays can help efficiently track presence of values.

Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.