#2763
Sum of Imbalance Numbers of All Subarrays
HardArrayHash TableEnumerationHash MapArray
Approaches
Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
| Brute Force | Optimal Solution★ | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n²) | O(n² log n) |
| Space | O(1) | O(n) |
💡
Intuition
Time O(n² log n)Space O(n)
The optimal approach uses a HashMap to track the frequency of elements in the current subarray, allowing us to efficiently calculate the imbalance without sorting. This approach reduces the time complexity significantly.
⚙️
Algorithm
3 steps- 1Step 1: Initialize a HashMap to count occurrences of elements in the current subarray.
- 2Step 2: For each starting index, expand the subarray to the right, updating the HashMap.
- 3Step 3: Calculate the imbalance based on the keys in the HashMap, counting gaps greater than 1.
solution.py11 lines
1def sum_of_imbalance(nums):
2 total_imbalance = 0
3 n = len(nums)
4 for left in range(n):
5 count = {}
6 for right in range(left, n):
7 count[nums[right]] = count.get(nums[right], 0) + 1
8 keys = sorted(count.keys())
9 imbalance = sum(1 for i in range(len(keys) - 1) if keys[i + 1] - keys[i] > 1)
10 total_imbalance += imbalance
11 return total_imbalanceℹ
Complexity note: The time complexity is O(n² log n) due to the sorting of keys in the HashMap for each subarray, while the space complexity is O(n) for storing the frequency of elements.
- 1The imbalance number only increases when there are gaps greater than 1 between sorted elements.
- 2Using a HashMap allows for efficient counting of element frequencies, avoiding the need for repeated sorting.
Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.