#891
Sum of Subsequence Widths
HardArrayMathSortingSortingCombinatorial Counting
Approaches
Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
| Brute Force | Optimal Solution★ | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n²) | O(n log n) |
| Space | O(1) | O(1) |
💡
Intuition
Time O(n log n)Space O(1)
The optimal solution leverages sorting and combinatorial counting. By sorting the array, we can determine how many times each element contributes as a maximum and minimum in various subsequences, allowing us to compute the total width efficiently.
⚙️
Algorithm
4 steps- 1Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order.
- 2Step 2: For each element nums[i], calculate its contribution as a maximum and minimum in subsequences based on its position.
- 3Step 3: Use combinatorial counting to determine how many subsequences include nums[i] as the maximum and how many include it as the minimum.
- 4Step 4: Sum these contributions and return the result modulo 10^9 + 7.
solution.py11 lines
1# Full working Python code
2def sum_of_subsequence_widths(nums):
3 MOD = 10**9 + 7
4 nums.sort()
5 n = len(nums)
6 total_width = 0
7 for i in range(n):
8 max_contrib = nums[i] * (1 << i) % MOD
9 min_contrib = nums[i] * (1 << (n - 1 - i)) % MOD
10 total_width = (total_width + max_contrib - min_contrib) % MOD
11 return total_widthℹ
Complexity note: The time complexity is O(n log n) due to the sorting step, and the space complexity is O(1) since we are using a constant amount of extra space.
- 1Sorting the array allows us to efficiently calculate contributions as max and min.
- 2Each element's contribution can be determined using combinatorial counting.
Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.