#1226
The Dining Philosophers
MediumConcurrencyMutexLocking mechanisms
Approaches
Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
| Brute Force | Optimal Solution★ | |
|---|---|---|
| Time | O(n²) | O(n) |
| Space | O(1) | O(1) |
💡
Intuition
Time O(n)Space O(1)
To avoid deadlock, we can enforce a rule where philosophers pick up the forks in a specific order. For example, if all philosophers pick up the right fork first, it ensures that at least one philosopher can always eat, preventing starvation.
⚙️
Algorithm
5 steps- 1Step 1: Each philosopher will always pick up the right fork first.
- 2Step 2: If they can pick up the right fork, they then try to pick up the left fork.
- 3Step 3: If both forks are acquired, they eat.
- 4Step 4: After eating, they put down both forks.
- 5Step 5: Repeat the process.
solution.py20 lines
1import threading
2
3class DiningPhilosophers:
4 def __init__(self):
5 self.forks = [threading.Lock() for _ in range(5)]
6
7 def wantsToEat(self, philosopher, pickLeftFork, pickRightFork, eat, putLeftFork, putRightFork):
8 left = philosopher
9 right = (philosopher + 1) % 5
10 while True:
11 self.forks[right].acquire()
12 self.forks[left].acquire()
13 pickRightFork()
14 pickLeftFork()
15 eat()
16 putRightFork()
17 putLeftFork()
18 self.forks[left].release()
19 self.forks[right].release()
20 breakℹ
Complexity note: The time complexity is O(n) because each philosopher can potentially eat without waiting indefinitely, ensuring that they can continue their cycle of thinking and eating without deadlock.
- 1Using a specific order for picking forks can prevent deadlock.
- 2Concurrency problems often require careful resource management.
Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.