#477

Total Hamming Distance

Medium
ArrayMathBit ManipulationBit ManipulationArray
LeetCode ↗

Approaches

Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
Brute ForceOptimal Solution
Time
O(n²)
O(n)
Space
O(1)
O(1)
💡

Intuition

Time O(n)Space O(1)

Instead of calculating the Hamming distance for every pair, we can count how many numbers have a bit set at each position. This allows us to compute the contribution of each bit position to the total Hamming distance more efficiently.

⚙️

Algorithm

5 steps
  1. 1Step 1: Initialize a variable to store the total Hamming distance.
  2. 2Step 2: Iterate through each bit position from 0 to 31 (since nums[i] <= 10^9 fits in 32 bits).
  3. 3Step 3: For each bit position, count how many numbers have that bit set (1) and how many do not (0).
  4. 4Step 4: The contribution to the total Hamming distance from this bit position is the product of the count of 1s and 0s.
  5. 5Step 5: Add this contribution to the total.
solution.py13 lines
1# Full working Python code
2
3def totalHammingDistance(nums):
4    total = 0
5    n = len(nums)
6    for i in range(32):
7        count_one = sum((num >> i) & 1 for num in nums)
8        count_zero = n - count_one
9        total += count_one * count_zero
10    return total
11
12# Example usage
13print(totalHammingDistance([4, 14, 2]))  # Output: 6

Complexity note: The time complexity is O(n) because we iterate through the array a constant number of times (32 for each bit position). The space complexity is O(1) since we only use a fixed amount of extra space.

  • 1The Hamming distance is fundamentally about comparing bits, so understanding bit manipulation is crucial.
  • 2Counting contributions from each bit position is more efficient than brute-force pairwise comparisons.

Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.