#467

Unique Substrings in Wraparound String

Medium
StringDynamic ProgrammingDynamic ProgrammingSliding Window
LeetCode ↗

Approaches

Brute ForceOptimal
Complexity Comparison
Brute ForceOptimal Solution
Time
O(n²)
O(n)
Space
O(1)
O(1)
💡

Intuition

Time O(n)Space O(1)

The optimal approach leverages dynamic programming to count the length of valid substrings that can be formed in the wraparound string. By tracking the longest valid substring ending at each character, we can efficiently calculate the number of unique substrings.

⚙️

Algorithm

4 steps
  1. 1Step 1: Initialize an array to track the length of valid substrings ending at each character.
  2. 2Step 2: Iterate through the string and update the length for each character based on the previous character's wraparound condition.
  3. 3Step 3: Use a HashMap to store the maximum length of valid substrings for each character.
  4. 4Step 4: Sum the lengths of unique substrings for each character to get the total count.
solution.py15 lines
1# Full working Python code
2def unique_substrings_optimal(s):
3    max_length = [0] * 26
4    current_length = 0
5    total_unique = 0
6
7    for i in range(len(s)):
8        if i > 0 and (ord(s[i]) - ord(s[i - 1]) + 26) % 26 == 1:
9            current_length += 1
10        else:
11            current_length = 1
12        index = ord(s[i]) - ord('a')
13        max_length[index] = max(max_length[index], current_length)
14
15    return sum(max_length)

Complexity note: The time complexity is O(n) because we iterate through the string once. The space complexity is O(1) since we only use a fixed-size array of size 26 for the alphabet.

  • 1Understanding the wraparound nature of the string is crucial for efficiently checking substrings.
  • 2Dynamic programming can significantly reduce the time complexity by avoiding redundant checks.

Solutions and explanations are original Tejav content. Problem titles © LeetCode — use the LeetCode button above for the full problem statement.